Before we focus on this topic,
let me introduce some background information first. There are four elements can
determine the labor productivity: physical capital per worker (machines, software,
etc.), human capital per worker (knowledge and skill-
one might also add level of effort), natural resources per worker and technological
knowledge.
About “Technological change”,
it is mean change in the quantity of output a firm can produce from a given
quantity of inputs which is mean better ways of organizing production. We can
find many example like, Henry Ford and the assembly line, Toyota and “just in
time” production, Walmart and then Amazon in retailing. The new products they
produced can do what old ones did better or at less cost.
So to increase production which
one we should invest more money? Should it be capital change (physical capital,
human capital) or technological knowledge?
I think we can analysis this
question in two ways
First, we solve this problem
from the production function. A production
function is Y = A•F (L, K, H, N), which Y is output, L is number
of workers, K is physical capital, H is human capital, N is natural resources
and A is a measure of technology. So if we can add one more unit on A, we can
have a bigger result than we add one more unit in the F. Because by increasing
the A, the number we get is increasing multiply.
We also can think this question
in logical way. If we add so much funds on capital, it will cause “Diminishing
returns” which like the picture I show below.
As the picture describe,
productivity can grow is by giving workers more capital to work with, but we
expect the increases in output to diminish as more capital is added. So Diminishing
returns to increasing quantity of capital. A failure of the Soviet Union was
too much emphasis on the quantity of capital, without incentives for improving
technology.
Above all, even thorough both
are important, technological change should occupy more attentions.
Citation:
Mankiw, Brief Principles of Macroeconomics, 7th edition

No comments:
Post a Comment